Two years ago, we set out to create a revolutionary product that people would love. The Daily delivered great original reporting, excellent design, and custom interactivity to users every day. Although we have over 100,000 passionate paying subscribers, unfortunately we have not been able to build a big enough audience fast enough to make our business model work.

Memo to staff from The Daily’s editor in chief Jesse Angelo and publisher Greg Clayman.

The News: The two-year-old iPad only newspaper will shut down after releasing its December 15 issue.

The Issue(s): Basically, being locked into the iPad. Yes, the Daily had a hundred thousand subscribers, and yes, it built out a robust social media presence but going iPad only for the meat of its content was too much too soon. There were just too many people locked out (and locked in) for it to thrive.

Another way to put it is this thought from Trevor Butterworth, a former weekly columnist for The Daily:

So, The Daily meets its doom on December 15. The editorial section, et moi, bit the dust over the summer, so not much of a shock. The single biggest failing? You can’t create an entirely new brand and take it behind a paywall after 4 weeks, while limiting its footprint on the Internet, and then expect people to buy it. Where was the marketing?

Second, it simply added more average-reader content to a market saturated with free average-reader content. It didn’t have the courage to be cool, quirky, nerdy, obsessive or snarky. Its demise is a wake-up call for those who confuse cool technology with being cool - and those who think more of the sameness is going to produce a paying customer base for a mainstream media product.

(via futurejournalismproject)

(via newsweek)

Previous Next

51 notes

  1. intervistato reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  2. hypothetical-kazoos reblogged this from newsweek
  3. colintedford said: Not that I know from news economics, but it blows my mind that 100,000 subscribers isn’t enough.
  4. thesocialmedianerd reblogged this from newsweek
  5. seldridge reblogged this from cleofuckingpatra
  6. profoundbusiness reblogged this from whatevs
  7. mylesdannhausen reblogged this from newsweek
  8. whatevs reblogged this from newsweek
  9. isabowel reblogged this from newsweek
  10. cecchi reblogged this from newsweek
  11. grayblue reblogged this from newsweek
  12. danilobortoli reblogged this from newsweek
  13. cleofuckingpatra reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  14. newsweek reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  15. inthenewsindia reblogged this from futurejournalismproject
  16. michaelk42 reblogged this from futurejournalismproject